Find us on: LinkedIn Home Site Map Contact

Drilling Moratorium Has Unintended Consequences

June 07, 2010

As most people are becoming aware of, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is

dramatically changing the politics of energy in this country. Weeks

after the tragic explosion that killed 11 workers and resulted in the

leak, President Obama suspended oil exploration in two areas of the

coast of Alaska; cancelled pending lease sales in the Gulf and off the

East Coast; extended by six months a moratorium on deepwater

drilling permits; and suspended operations at 33 exploratory wells

being drilled in the Gulf.

Many believe the president overreacted, as politicians tend to

do when the media spotlight shines brightly on them. But, beyond

politics his actions will have serious implications on future supply of

both oil and gas, and thus, force a spike in prices, particularly down

the road when new production areas were scheduled to come on

line. His actions obviously have a near-term impact as well, including

the loss of thousands of energy jobs, not to mention the impact on

fishing and tourism.

First a little background on Gulf drilling. We currently get 33

percent of our oil and 10 percent of our natural gas from the Gulf of

Mexico. According to the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association

(LMOGA) there are currently 4,515 producing shallow-water

wells and 591 producing deepwater wells. Deepwater is anything

deeper than 500 feet. Some 80 percent of the Gulf oil production

and 45 percent of the gas production comes from the 591 deepwater

production wells.

The six-month moratorium on Gulf exploration will, in all likelihood,

result in a 12-18 month halt in exploration because the 33

drilling rigs currently in operation will either be moved overseas, or

idled. The thousands of workers displaced by the moratorium will

leave the industry, or look for similar work elsewhere. History shows,

though, that whenever there is a downturn in drilling and people

leave the industry they rarely come back. Some of the world’s most

experienced and talented people will be lost, and at a time when

there already is a shortage of such people.

According to LMOGA, each of the 33 rigs currently operating in

the Gulf have day lease rates ranging from $250,000 to $500,000,

resulting in a daily loss of about $16,500,000. Each rig averages

between 90 and 140 workers. Each job supports four other jobs in

related support industries. People naturally go where the work is.

 

 

And, once they find employment, are hesitant to return to earlier

jobs, even when they may be plentiful. Obviously, the deepwater

industry will come back eventually, but the loss of such experienced

workers will be very difficult to overcome. This proves once again

that there are unintended consequences of such decisions, and

when politics is the driver, they tend to multiply.

It should be noted that the thousands of workers employed in

the shallow water production areas are not impacted by the moratorium.

However, the deepwater is where the greatest potential for

future supply lies, and therein is the issue.

The depletion rates of offshore wells has become more rapid,

and there must be a constant effort to replace the fields that are

now supplying us so much of our energy, particularly natural gas.

This is important to all of us because natural gas is increasingly becoming

the fuel of choice for power generation. When supplies are

tight and demand begins to pick up prices rise, and we all need to

realize that the price we pay for electricity is tied to the cost of the

fuel used to generate it. Right now we have an oversupply situation

and prices are depressed. Electricity prices are at some of the lowest

levels seen in years. However, when demand begins to pick up and

we work off the oversupply, prices will naturally rise.

While high prices tend to force conservation (a good thing),

there are those who are attempting to use this situation to rapidly

move us away from a fossil fuel future. The problem is there is nothing

to take its place. The tie-in to wean us off of foreign oil rings

hollow, because the whole point of drilling offshore is to make us

less dependent upon foreign energy. I’m not convinced that we as a

country are willing to buy more foreign energy (and pay more for it)

in this interim 30-50 year period before the clean energy environment

takes root.

So, a politically expedient decision to halt all exploration, even

for six months, will have a long-term impact. Unfortunately, the industry,

and the economy, won’t return to normal any time soon.

That’s unfortunate because just off the north coast of Cuba in the

very ocean currents that we’re so concerned with, the Russians are

drilling. You can bet they do so with very few environmental or

safety concerns.

 

 

JUN 2010

 

| 07